I've been delivering a verbal version of this taxonomy for years now to the uninitiated. Technically, as long as you are passionately into something, you can correctly call yourself a "_______ Nerd"; but, when decontextualized from the safe haven of a prefix like "mountain biking" or "hi-fi equipment", we are left with the question: what is a NERD's nerd? How does that differ from being a GEEK? And what precisely is a DORK, although we all know it's bad?
Here are some of my basic posited elements of the three Houses of Nerd, in cartoon form. (Click to see the image at medium size, click again to see at full.)
← Ctrl← Alt
Ctrl →Alt →
May 5 2008, 21:29:07 UTC 4 years ago
May 5 2008, 21:34:41 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
May 5 2008, 21:31:57 UTC 4 years ago
May 5 2008, 21:33:36 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
May 5 2008, 21:38:22 UTC 4 years ago
That last one should be n. trogloditus I believe.
May 5 2008, 21:41:42 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
May 5 2008, 21:42:00 UTC 4 years ago
May 5 2008, 21:45:56 UTC 4 years ago
Also, if you THINK that your social skills are poor, that means you're self-aware, which actually nudges you closer to the high-functioning geek category.
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
May 5 2008, 21:43:44 UTC 4 years ago
(I think I'm pretty much halfway between your nerd and your geek. Woo, Firefly! Woo, triple integral!)
May 5 2008, 21:48:16 UTC 4 years ago
May 5 2008, 21:44:23 UTC 4 years ago
May 5 2008, 21:46:41 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
May 5 2008, 21:50:01 UTC 4 years ago
Now I want to see a pie-chart dividing up the each different con into attendence percentages by each group.
May 5 2008, 22:01:49 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
Deleted comment
May 5 2008, 22:07:34 UTC 4 years ago
Usually, the taxonomy I use is that a Geek knows far more about topic X than the average person. A Nerd knows far more about topic X than he does anything else. A scifi geek can explain to you the difference between Star Wars and Firefly. A scifi nerd will tell you about Star Trek continuity errors at your wedding.
But a Dork is a Dork the world around.
May 5 2008, 22:11:46 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
May 5 2008, 22:13:32 UTC 4 years ago
p.s. Do you think that more geeks are female than male, and more nerds are male than female? (I find it often seems that way.) This would make an interesting anthropological study... although I'm sure someone has already done it.
May 5 2008, 22:23:33 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
May 5 2008, 22:14:19 UTC 4 years ago
"MEDIC!"
"un-ironic interpretation of Starship Troopers"Wow. That describes the entire back row of my high school physics class.
May 5 2008, 22:17:58 UTC 4 years ago
Re: "MEDIC!"
anybody who doesn't realize that movie is a black comedy probably isn't very interesting. Anybody who doesn't realize that movie is a black comedy and still likes it is an asshole.And anybody who realizes it's a black comedy, likes it, and can point to the direct production connection to Battlestar Galactica is MY KIND OF PEOPLE.
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
May 5 2008, 22:15:47 UTC 4 years ago
May 5 2008, 22:20:21 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
May 5 2008, 22:30:04 UTC 4 years ago
The words are not interchangeable.
Yes! Exactly! Thank you!May 5 2008, 22:30:37 UTC 4 years ago
I'm a big fan of Doofs and Goofs.
Dylan, can I be a doof?May 5 2008, 22:39:38 UTC 4 years ago
Re: I'm a big fan of Doofs and Goofs.
Ah yes, the most huggable sub-category of geek!4 years ago
4 years ago
May 5 2008, 22:56:06 UTC 4 years ago
May 5 2008, 23:06:25 UTC 4 years ago
Ah, but...
...what about the Dweeb?May 5 2008, 23:18:44 UTC 4 years ago
Re: Ah, but...
Dweeb is thus far an unscientific classification - for example, Steve Buscemi's character in Ghost World is what I'd call a dweeb.May 5 2008, 23:24:52 UTC 4 years ago
FTW!
The geek looks like everyone who's ever attended my school, including the guys.I really don't need to say that I go to art college, do I?
May 5 2008, 23:26:06 UTC 4 years ago
Re: FTW!
no. no, you don't.May 6 2008, 00:39:07 UTC 4 years ago
Oh, and you're wonderful, by the way.
May 6 2008, 00:47:16 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
May 6 2008, 02:13:55 UTC 4 years ago
May 6 2008, 02:15:13 UTC 4 years ago
*creeps people out on the bus*
May 6 2008, 02:24:24 UTC 4 years ago
Ah, nomenclature
Now, see, I appreciate this classification scheme generally, but the local usage tends to be much kinder to the dorks, to the extent that I generally categorize myself as something of a dork/geek hybrid. Perhaps it's because I just don't include your dork in the "true nerds" family; my preferred characterization of a dork is one who transgresses (mostly) consciously (but not maliciously) against social norms as they please. As in "that really dorky dancing guy," meaning not the creepy one getting way too close to your bosoms but the one with the bowling shoes and his eyes half-closed who's really, really into it. One may argue he's not conscious of his dorkitude, but that's taxonomy for you.May 6 2008, 05:38:19 UTC 4 years ago
Re: Ah, nomenclature
oh sure, "dork" can be applied as a kind of fond derogatory term. It's kind of like calling a friend "psycho".4 years ago
May 6 2008, 02:41:56 UTC 4 years ago
May 6 2008, 03:39:38 UTC 4 years ago
Alas, I am manga-ignorant.
May 6 2008, 03:45:39 UTC 4 years ago
Yay!
Excellent visual aid! I was trying to explain this very taxonomy to my mom last night.May 6 2008, 04:05:09 UTC 4 years ago
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolife
May 6 2008, 06:13:23 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
← Ctrl← Alt
Ctrl →Alt →